3SOF

WHAY IS there high insider selling? specially from the CEO??!

Great run for this stock. It is going up like a rocket. Why is no one following this stock??
The P/E is still very low. it has space to go up.

My Pick is ABLE Energy Inc,

Profile: Able Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the distribution and marketing of home heating oil, propane gas and equipment, and diesel fuels. The company offers heating, ventilation, air conditioning, installation, and repair services

Technical:
it's very very Strong. Hit the $7.70, a break out form two huge Resistances point at $6.95 and $7.51. Broke the 15day MA, and the positive MACD crossover. Next major resistance is around $9.0. With some good news and institutional buying AbLE could go back to $18.

I read and bought into INTC a week ago. As i expected INTC is finally waking up. AMD is down for the second day on a row while intc is up. THe tide is shifting. INTC BACK TO $25.

any input

I think BCON is going to hold above $1. Some people have great expectations for BCON. Summer is coming, "anyone think that BCON IS GOING to Explod like last summer?"

I would wait till GNTA crosses over $2.00. OR some good news. GNTA is truly a good long term investment. GO GNTA

IF GNBT keeps the good news coming we will see a very nice year.

If MOVI hold above the 200MA thru next week. This stock is bound to rebound this year. MOVI FOR LONG.

Cheap and Cheap. This is a great time to get in. I just got in today at $4.80. I am riding this thing long. "maybe a buyout is coming"

ANYONE who wants to make any money...INTC is one of the best investments outhere....
Read this article....

FYI -- Wall Street Analyst Quotes about AMD vs. Woodcrest/Core.

(Note: At its analyst mtg. yesterday, AMD put up foils showing Woodcrest at a 28% power disadvantage relative to Opteron based on questionable analysis -- strong support from the server team allowed us to mount a Blackberry campaign to educate analysts as they prepared their reports. While many analysts have good things to say about AMD, their attempts vs. Woodcrest / Core have been impacted. For some reason, their stock is down 3% -- not what one hopes for after such an event.)

***

Joe Osha, Merrill Lynch

Overall, it's hard to criticize anything that AMD is doing, and if we were in management's shoes we would be doing the same thing that AMD is. The problem is that Intel is no longer asleep at the switch, and is getting ready to offer products that compete effectively with AMD across most of AMD's lineup. It's not clear to us that AMD is equipped to withstand that competitive pressure without seeing financial performance deteriorate. We reiterate our sell rating.



David Wu, Global Crown Capital: "Lies, Damn Lies, and ..."

We were perplexed by AMD's performance-per-watt leadership claim as 1) AMD deliberately compared its Opteron to Paxville (soon-to-be 2 generations old) and avoided Intel's extremely competitive Woodcrest processor that will be launched in a few weeks; 2) AMD again decreased Opteron's total system power consumption by ignoring North Bridge components and increased Woodcrest's by doubling the number of memory slots (16 FB-DIMMs instead of a typical 8 FB-DIMMs for DP). According to trusted 3rd party reviews, Woodcrest DP system consumes roughly 20% less power and outperforms at least 20% at the same time .... The new platforms that AMD announced (4x4, Torrenza, Trinity, and Raiden) do not have firm delivery dates .... Our investment thesis is that Intel will recapture market shares in volume server and the desktop markets from new product launches in Jun06/Jul06 and should have product superiority for at least 4 quarters. We recommend buying the stock before market share shifting significantly in INTC's favor starting 3QCY06. Roadmap comparison: AMD will not have competitive microprocessors in the desktop, DP server and the workstation markets until their first quad core processor Deerhound in 2HCY07.



Hans Mosesmann, Moors & Cabot

Rather than comment on various benchmarks Intel has released based on real world applications (where Woodcrest has a 13% - 18% edge in power), AMD preferred to compare Projected (theoretical) Platform Power Consumption using maximum power specs in the calculations, which we dare say is ripe for debate. In AMD's example, Opteron trounces Woodcrest by some 28% less power though in reality we don't believe all system components would run at max power simultaneously. As an example, the memory subsystem would not be running at max power when the CPU is running at max power. AMD failed to include the power used by a PCIe bridge and doubled the content of the Intel system memory (above average configurations). We are sure that critical observers can also make the same arguments on configurations of both systems to prove their side of the argument; our point is that to make the case in the performance/watt discussion, why not put a real AMD Opteron system vs. a real Intel Woodcrest system and prove the point. Or at least make the case that last week's benchmarks from Intel are suspect in some way or fashion. In summary, the real world comparison of these server systems would not only be intellectually more powerful in proving a point, it also would limit observers, such as ourselves, who are starting to get a sense that AMD has been caught flat footed on how to position its product line to Intel's Core.

AMD WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STAY A HEAD OF INTC FOR LONG. AMD IS GOING DoWN...GO INTC