3StocksOnFire — US Stock Trading Community · 451+ trades · 257% returns · 15,000 members · Main Site · Trader's Guide · Articles · Video Analyses
3 Stocks On Fire
3StocksOnFire Community Forum
Home Message Boards Trader's Guide Articles Video Analysis About Us Search Register

STTK.OB BIRD FLU STOCK

Started by SeeingGreen, November 21, 2005, 09:32:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

2ez

FYI -


Posted on another board:





to this link (Replace "dot" with a dot and delete the extra "h" at the beginning):

hhttp://www.wallstreetdigest dot com/specialstock/specialstocklogin.html

A Personal Message to Readers of StockLemon.Com and Investors of Storage Alliance, Inc. (SGAL) from Donald H. Rowe and The Wall Street Digest

On March 24, 2003, StockLemon.com posted an "investigative report" on its Web site and released a statement to the financial media criticizing Storage Alliance, Inc. (SGAL). In this so-called "investigative report," StockLemon.com also criticizes Donald Rowe for recommending the company's stock to subscribers of The Wall Street Digest.

On March 26, 2003, StockLemon.com released Part Two of its "investigative report" to the investment community. Once again, Donald Rowe was highly criticized by the unidentified writer, who stated that he had called Mr. Rowe with questions regarding Storage Alliance, but had been "rushed off the phone" due to the imminent move of The Wall Street Digest's offices. (NOTE: After 14 years of publishing The Wall Street Digest from 2 North Tamiami Trail, Ste. 602, Sarasota, Florida, the publication's headquarters moved to 8830 South Tamiami Trail, Ste. 110, Sarasota, Florida. This move was pre-announced to subscribers of The Wall Street Digest for almost an entire month prior to the physical move on March 28-31, 2003.)

The "journalist," who called Donald Rowe during the move gave his name as "Mr. Rosen," but did not leave a phone number where he could be reached at a more convenient time. Nor did he identify himself or his "publication" when he called The Wall Street Digest's offices. He simply stated that he was a journalist who was "returning Don's call." Clearly, this was a deceptive, untrue statement.

Since posting his vitriolic commentary on his Web site and releasing his "press releases" to the investment community, this is what we have learned about Mr. Rosen, a.k.a. William Harris, a.k.a. William Smith.

#1: In a press release dated March 26, 2003, Stocklemon.com is identified as "an independent website that has been serving the microcap community since 1991." This is a highly suspect statement, since the vast majority of investors and the investment community at-large did not discover the Internet prior to 1994-1995. However, a Bill Harris did create the domain name, "Stocklemon.com" on August 1, 2001, ten years later than the year claimed in Stocklemon.com's press releases. After registering Stocklemon.com, Mr. Harris/Rosen/Smith then released his first "investigative report" on August 6, 2001, and posted it to his newly created Web site.

#2: The contact information that Bill Harris provided when he created Stocklemon.com on August 1, 2001, consists of two non-published phone numbers, a Hotmail e-mail address, and two conflicting street addresses in California-one of which does not appear to exist on any published map.

#3: In his inflammatory allegations concerning Donald Rowe's qualifications to analyze and recommend stocks, Mr. Harris/Rosen/Smith directs his readers to a 1999 "Bull and Bear" archival page where, in a reprint of a July 1999 report on Internet stocks and The Wall Street Digest's November 1999 issue featuring those same stocks, Mr. Rowe recommended several securities that were also recommended by the vast majority of momentum investment advisors in 1999. Those stock recommendations were: Qualcomm, MCI WorldCom, Excite At Home, Broadcom, Lucent Technologies, CMGI,


2ez

a number of companies? See the GNBT msg bd for the comments regarding that and then perform a search to see what you find.

More from the previous link:

We find this final paragraph of Stocklemon.com's disclaimer most revealing (bold-face type is Stocklemon.com's):

"At any times [sic] the principles [sic] of Stocklemon.com might hold a position in any of the securities profiled on the site. Stocklemon.com will not report when a position is initiated or [sic] covered. Each investor must make that decision based on his/her judgment of the market."

Indeed, we believe this last paragraph reveals far more about the reason for Stocklemon.com's existence than the mere fact that it is a "free site" for disgruntled OTC investors. We believe the principal(s) of Stocklemon.com created the site for the sole purpose of finding OTC stocks that could be manipulated into short-position bonanzas for Stocklemon.com's owner(s). In fact, the site's "Your Lemon" page includes this suspected short-seller's invitation to "join our investigative team" and provide Stocklemon.com with additional stock manipulation leads.

#5: In a press release dated November 15, 2001, Stocklemon.com describes itself as "a free site that profiles companies on the OTC BB marketplace. The principles [sic] of Stocklemon.com often do have positions that are consistent with the report that is being presented. No employee of Stocklemon.com is a chartered financial analyst or [sic] a licensed investment advisor."

Even more so than in Stocklemon.com's posted legal disclaimer, we believe the above statement is an admission that the owner(s) of Stocklemon.com are shorting the stocks they are blasting in their so-called "investigative reports" on Stocklemon.com.

Most importantly, the owner(s) of Stocklemon.com (Mr. Harris/Rosen/Smith, et. al.) freely admit that they are neither chartered financial analysts nor licensed investment advisors. So who are they? They offer no clue on their Web site other than the most obvious: professional short-sellers who are looking for OTC companies to manipulate for their own profit.

#6: A careful review of the trading history of Stocklemon.com's targeted stocks between August 6, 2001, and March 28, 2003, indicates that in every situation except one, a short-position taken just prior to the release of a Stocklemon.com "investigative report," would have produced good-to-phenomenal profits for short-sellers of those OTC stocks. Coincidence? Perhaps, but why hasn't Mr. Harris/Rosen/Smith posted his true identity and/or qualifications for investment commentary on Stocklemon.com? Does he fear exposure as an active short-seller of OTC securities?

As revealed in #5 above, Mr. Harris/Rosen/Smith has freely admitted the following:

"The principles [sic] of Stocklemon.com often do have positions that are consistent with the report that is being presented."

We continue to believe that the principal(s) of Stocklemon.com, whoever they are, deliberately trash good companies for the purpose of generating short-term, short-selling trading profits.

The following are possible short-selling profits, based upon the timing of Stocklemon.com's articles targeted against OTC stocks:
TARGET

2ez




Questions have been raised about the existence of our technology. We would like to assure our shareholders that our technology does exist and a brief video synopsis of our demonstration in China has been available on our website since Monday, April 3, 2006. Our technology has been developed using already available RFID hardware and adding our own proprietary software to it. As a security company, we have been exposed to RFID technology as it is a tool that is commonly used in the security industry.

As for our financial stability, we have been meeting our obligations as they have become due and as has been disclosed, we continue to add to our portfolio of projects in the mixed residential/commercial sector of our business. Furthermore, as disclosed in our form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, our total contract backlog was approximately $3,562,468, which represents the value of contracts that have been awarded and that have not yet been completed. Based on our estimates, we now believe that number is approximately $5,000,000.

Our recently announced $5,000,000 order from China certainly will have a significant positive impact on the Company's financial status. This order represents the launch of our new business sector that has a tremendous potential to further strengthen our business.

shipman

Sold with a 51% loss.  I'm frickin sick.  I think that's it for me.  Learned my lesson,  DON"T STEP IN FRONT OF A LEMON!!!!  I don't give a $%^# if the company is trying to console me, this sucked and left a bad taste in my mouth.  Good luck to anyone else holding,  I hope you at least get your money back.  The company is probably alright and on the up and up, but that dosen't help my account any. 

2ez

it's crazy how this works.  shows just how emotional the market is.

i thought the $5mil contract would over-ride the article from StockLemon, but this did not happen.

You are not alone   Shipman.  I keep telling myself to stay away from the pennys.  Only time i have ever lost $$$ was with the pennys. 


I still believe this will go up.....not sure how much, but many are still watching it.    

OneStockMind

Hey shipman.. this kind of a thing happens to everybody. Here's my example:
I bought STTK about 6 months ago for .66. I was down for months over 60%. Finally the stock started going up and I got out at .83 for about 25% profit.

Today I wanted to flip it quickly but that wasn't smart at all. I was greedy and took a pretty big position for a bigger "gain". I bought it at .80 and sold for .60. Nice 25% loss in a couple of hours.
So I pretty much gave back what I gained waiting half a year for it.

I think this stock will go up after it stops selling so it will give us another opportunity.
This game is created for scammers that can short and make big bucks in a very short period of time. By the time people realized they were lying about STTK the damage is done. They got their profit and trading can continue... beautiful game for those that control it.

I totally understand your pain, I lost over 2k today on it. You have to be a hero in daytrading and stay focused even when you lose. That's the only way to make money in this game.

fluxanimator

I bought AIDO the other day at .88 and 1.20. Look at it now .63. I was able today to buy another 2k at .55 so I covered a bit but I am still down overall. Sucks.

2ez

#157
OneStockmind is on point.  learn from this and move on.  Create a better trading plan and let's not get greedy next time.

I bought in at .90 and got all caught up with the hype.  Still holding.   Thinking if it drops, dollar cost average and wait it out. 


one big positive here...is the $5mil contract and the company's response to Stocklemon is telling in itself.  It's telling me there is something here worth holding.       

yabadabado

Wow, what a fall  :o
So, I bought 10k at .82, since company gave pretty good pr about their standing at this point.
But, heck it still dropped.
Far as I know, it is over sold, since RSI has dropped below 50 and red bar dropped below SMA 18.
If it does drops to .50, back up your truck and load it up, becasue it will break $1.00 again.

This is JMO. So, do your own DD.




dennis67

what do you guys think now? i hope i didnt do something stupid here  i bought  this on todays news for .78  and right after that it drops :(

2ez

TA indicates oversold. 

$5mil indicates interest in what the companies has to offer.

StockLemon.com indicates something fishy


I was hoping for a little more of a pullback to buy more.  I thought this would be the case since it is friday.  I am thinking this will inch up a little at a time. People are cautious now.   

wiredkta

What makes STTK more better than AIDO? 

2ez

I am more interested in trading the stock, not investing. 


but i like em both. 

2ez

Maybe an opportunity for STTK and AIDO



9:45 a.m.: The Asian Development Bank granted Vietnam $15 million to fight bird flu and other infectious diseases. "Vietnam and other countries in the region are still facing the potential and recurrent outbreak of emerging infectious diseases such as bird flu, SARS, HIV/AIDS and dengue," State Bank Governor Le Duc Thuy said. The money is part of a $30 million grant project to help Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia battle bird flu and other diseases, and will go toward strengthening surveillance, improving disease control and building regional cooperation.


2ez

From another board.......

You be the judge......




This is what it's all about boys! Contracts already in play. These stocks are battered since the massive rally last week and this week. The perfect time to buy.

Not trying to pump these, but hey, facts is facts. ...at least see if you might be interested.

Its just business.

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/04/07/1550105.htm

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1501AP_Animal_ID.html

http://www2.humboldt.edu/~merge/modules.php?op=modload&name=PagEd&file=index&pag e_id=1517

"If the U.S. Department of Agriculture has its way, every livestock animal, including your pet chicken, will be micro-chipped and added into a giant national database to track the spread of disease.

Since the mad cow outbreak in 2003, the USDA has been developing a National Animal Identification System (NAIS) to monitor the movement of animals and ensure quality meat for international export."