NXCO.PK

[sir_joke]

interesting to look at... Has distribution, clients within the entertainment industry,
GetAmnesty... anti pirate software and illegal download licensing (copyright fees).

other boards for discussion:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=10581
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NXCN

212 million outstanding....  volume has picked up...
watching since last summer at $.02 to $.04 level   boosted to $.12 but back to $.06 now

own 750000 shares personnally.

cheers,
SJ

[sir_joke]

short selling may finally be done. Officially removed from RSO list today.

Time to trade on increased volume....  This could pop back to $.12 in the next couple of days.

cheers,
SJ

ps. when contract values are announced this could go quite a bit higher.

[sir_joke]

Everyone here needs to be looking at this particular company. Long term goals and contracts
are going to be stellar.  Interest is clearly up over the last couple of days and if you didn't double your money from $.03 to $.06 you are wasting your time.....

But the big volume is yet to come and I do mean COME!

see this issue rise to at the very least $.60 within the next 3 months!  Who wouldn't want that
kind of profit?  This is a no brainer, folks.

Cheers,
SJ

[sir_joke]

Original capital investment firm Cornell partners is being bought out.
No more danger of death spiral share dilution.

The true value of Nexicon is $.58 pps   currently trading at $.05.

First four contracts to be announced within the next quarter and a return to OTCCBB.

Now would be the time to invest for a significant increase in profit$$$$$!

cheers,
SJ

[sir_joke]

Trading data analysis.... borrowed:

NXCN Technicals from Americanbulls looks good and we are basing here. Here is what it says after todays trading:

The last two candlesticks formed a Bullish Harami Cross Pattern . This is a bullish reversal pattern that marks a potential change in trend.

A bullish pattern has developed and a BUY-IF alert is issued today. The task is now to confirm the validity of this bullish pattern. We will guide you through this process but the prime star of this game is nobody but you. First you must do your homework. A good starting point may be to keep an eye on after-hours and futures trading to get preliminary hints about the direction of the market. Related news, events, economic data, and the world stock markets should also be closely followed prior to confirmation session.

There are three possible cases of confirmation. You have to follow the next session carefully to check if these cases will hold or not:

The market opens with an upward gap, signaling a bullish sentiment in the first case. Your benchmark will be the opening price. If the prices stay over the benchmark, go long. Any white candlestick with an upward gap is a valid confirmation criterion.

In the second case, the market opens at a level, equal to or below the previous day's close. The benchmark is that closing price. If prices during the session stay over the benchmark, go long. Any white candlestick closing above the previous day's close is the second confirmation criterion.

If, however, in both cases, the prices during the session start coming below the benchmark, avoid buying. Sell if you feel a definite tendency in prices to close the day below the benchmark.

The third case of confirmation is rarely observed. The market opens with a big downward gap suggesting a very bearish day, and the day ends with a long white candlestick, but still closing below the previous day's close. However, such a day satisfies the third confirmation criterion and in this case the closing price of the long white candlestick will be taken as the price of confirmation.

If one of the three confirmation criteria is not fulfilled, or in case of a black candlestick or a doji on the confirmation day, the BUY-IF alert remains valid, however without confirmation and the three confirmation criteria are then sought in the following day. The only exception is the long black candlestick. Any long black candlestick following a BUY-IF alert makes it (the signal) void and invalid.

We do not suggest any new short positions given the bullish alert. The short sellers should consider covering their positions if the market confirms the BUY-IF signal. Otherwise, existing short positions should be carried.

[sir_joke]

RS of 1: 1.6  very low RS and useful for shaking shorts up a bit.

NEws is good will post later.

[sir_joke]

Here's the corporate update borrowed from iHub board:


Nexicon Issues Corporate Update

GetAmnesty expands its reach in motion picture industry; establishes footprint in music industry

Apr 29, 2008 8:30:00 AM

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M., April 29 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Today, Nexicon (Pink Sheets: NXCN), New Symbol (Pink Sheets: NXCO) a leading supplier of anti-piracy and network security solutions provided the following update from Richard Urrea, CEO:

"As we continue into the second quarter of 2008, I am pleased to provide updates on Nexicon related to our recent financing, operations, and sales activities.

"As of the market open today, our stock will undergo a 1:1.6 reverse split, and our stock symbol will change to NXCO. This reverse split benefits the company by providing an improved capital structure for future financing activities. Our planned future financing requirements will support three main Nexicon initiatives: 1) begin the steps necessary for relisting on a broader financial exchange; 2) further enhance the architecture which supports our anti-piracy platform; and 3) improve the positioning of Nexicon in the marketplace as the global leader in anti-piracy solutions.

"On February 25th of this year, we announced that an investor group had entered into an agreement to acquire our outstanding notes due to Yorkville Advisors LLC, also known as Cornell Capital Partners. This was an extremely important accomplishment for Nexicon because the terms with our new investment partner are now aligned with the long term success of the company.

"For the last six months, Nexicon's pilot customers used our flagship GetAmnesty product to accomplish what has never been done before -- monetize on a large scale the losses caused by online piracy. We helped our customers achieve this accomplishment by leveraging our extremely efficient and robust technology platform. Now, for the first time in the copyright industry, a company offers a technology solution that simultaneously monitors illegal copyright downloads, analyzes this data, reports on these infringements, and collects settlement fees for our customers from these copyright infringers.

"One important feature of the GetAmnesty program is the distribution of DMCA notices on a mass scale. When we first tested the GetAmnesty program by emailing DMCA notices to individuals who had illegally downloaded a copyrighted movie, we received a settlement payment in 11 minutes. For our customer who owned the copyright to the movie, this was a watershed event. It confirmed that converting illegal downloaders of digital media into consumers -- without costly and time-consuming litigation -- is a reality.

"Other copyright owners heard about the success of the GetAmnesty solution, and we met with a number of high-profile companies in the motion picture industry. These companies are the leaders in their field -- including several of the "Big Six" motion picture studios. To date, one of these Big Six studios is contracted to receive business intelligence from Nexicon, and we have enrolled four independent motion picture studios in the GetAmnesty program. While we're proud of these contract signings, an even more exciting aspect of the GetAmnesty program for our team and for shareholders is that companies and artists who own copyrighted material are reaching out to us to learn about our anti-piracy solution. They like what they see, and want to enroll in the program.

"As a result of this feedback, Nexicon has further scaled our technology platform to meet demands, as evidenced by our technology platform's new ability to send 95 million infringement notices in a single day. Congratulations go to our CTO Tommy Stiansen and his team for continuing to drive innovation in our technology platform and developing a truly remarkable anti-piracy solution.

"Because of the complexity of our anti-piracy technology solutions, the sales cycles with some of these prospects are long - which can be frustrating to both management and our shareholders. That being said, I am now happy to report that we are in final negotiations to provide GetAmnesty and additional anti-piracy services to several motion picture studios. When complete, these agreements will provide Nexicon the green light to enforce the copyrights of the studios' digital media through GetAmnesty. Based on the number of titles and the online piracy associated with the titles, the size and scope of these potential agreements is significant -- we anticipate sending tens of thousands of settlement notices each day.

"Outside of the motion picture industry, Nexicon has recently made strong headway into the music industry by partnering with a marketing group representing a major artist in the music industry -- a Hall of Fame musician with dozens of Top-100 albums. Our technology development team is completing the final updates to a customized, artist-branded GetAmnesty site.

"Now is a very exciting time for Nexicon and its shareholders. We are working diligently to keep up with the demand for GetAmnesty product demonstrations. We are at last on sound financial footing. Our technology and infrastructure is ready. We've added an experienced and capable advisory board representing talent from Microsoft, Viewpoints Network, and City Capital Advisors. We've engaged with a boutique marketing consulting group who is currently upgrading our sales collateral, establishing relationships with IT analysts and journalists, and assisting in the establishment of the Nexicon brand. We at last have line of sight into significant revenue leading to sustainable profitability.

"On behalf of our management team, we thank you for your support, and I look forward to providing continued updates as we progress through 2008."

About Nexicon

Nexicon Inc. delivers next-generation anti-piracy, intellectual property security, business intelligence, and network security products and solutions. For more information on Nexicon, visit http://www.nexiconinc.com. For more information on GetAmnesty, visit http://www.getamnesty.com.

This release contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements appear in a number of places in this release and include all statements that are not statements of historical fact regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company, its directors or its officers with respect to, among other things: (i) the Company's financing plans; (ii) trends affecting the Company's financial condition or results of operations; (iii) the Company's growth strategy and operating strategy; and (iv) the declaration and payment of dividends. The words "may," "would," "will," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "believe," "intend," and similar expressions and variations thereof are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company's ability to control, and that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.

SOURCE Nexicon



----------------------------------------------
Richard Urrea of Nexicon
+1-310-817-6600

[sir_joke]

more news out today

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080506/latu080.html?.v=101

50% recovered costs go to GetAmnesty/Nexicon....

Conservative estimates for new share structure is $.75 pps.

Currently trading at $.032.

Cheers,
SJ

[sir_joke]

INTERNET REVIEW:

analysis of internet piracy and $$$ value

Hollywood Stock Review Online, Wednesday 4/30/2008.
==================================================
Table Of Contents:

1. Nexicon (NXCO) $0.035, And Digital Piracy Article In Business Week.
2. Nexicon, Sample of Actual Demand Letter from RIAA.
3. Disclaimer.
==================================================
Hollywood Stock Review.

(Proof It Works)

1. Nexicon (NXCO) $0.035, And Digital Piracy Article In Business Week.

Nexicon:
http://www.knobias.com/individual/public/quote.htm?aff=SAMPLE&ticker=nxco

A lot of you think (so we've been told) that they really aren't sure,
whether they can believe us, when we say that Nexicon actually has the
ability to track down what someone (meaning you) has illegally downloaded
(movie or music) and then send them a bill for it.

They have a hard time believing that someone actually knows, what sits
deep in our hard drive away from prying eyes. They think the technology
just sounds "too crazy." And of course having a stock whose shares trade
for less than a dime -- doesn't help in the credibility department. Trust
us, we understand (misunderstandings is how we make our money).

But we are here once again to tell you that the technology does indeed
exists and that if you or a member of your family illegally downloads via
a peer-to-peer network, you best ought to pay attention. Because
trouble-is-a-brewing. We are telling you. We are warning you. Please
listen up.

We've come across two items that we hope will convince you that the
technology does in fact exist. Proof positive in fact. First an article in
Business Week and also what an actual letter from the RIAA would look
like, if you get caught.

The important thing here in the article (as it relates to Nexicon) is
that:

A). Business Week has discovered that 40,000 people have been targeted for
legal action.
B). Up to 100 have decided to fight.
C). The competitor of Nexicon (Media Sentry) has a lesser quality system.

A and B):

Why is this important ? If 40,000 people have been targeted (meaning they
didn't pay to settle), then how many did settle and did pay ? This folks,
is how Nexicon intends to make money. Finding you and then having you pay
to settle. This fortune (bounty) will be split between Nexicon and the
Music or Movie studio !

Next, if 1 million people pay $100 to settle before getting to the point
where they start having to spend real money on lawyers and the like
(including sleepless nights) then the bounty would be $100 million
dollars. Sends a chill up our spine !

Sound like a lot ? The RIAA estimates the economic losses PER YEAR total
$12.5 billion. ( http://www.riaa.com/physicalpiracy.php )

This is no game. They are seriously mad, as the Business Week article
below details.

C). In the article they state that Media Sentry (
http://www.mediasentry.com/ ) has errors in identifying pirates up to 20%
of the time.

As this relates to Nexicon, you simply have to take our word for it (as we
are taking their word for it) that their system is much more accurate.
Until we see a news release that they've signed some big name Music or
Movie studio -- we'll still have to rely on faith. But then on the flip
side of the coin, that's what speculating is all about.

If you want to make money and be able to buy Nexicon for under a nickel,
you have to buy when the uncertainty is at the greatest -- cause there
ain't no way -- there ain't no how, this is trading at these levels if
they announce that they are sending out 1 million notices for payment on
behalf of XYZ Music studio. At lease that's what we think.

Note these quotes from the company in its recent shareholder update.
Nexicon gets paid in 11 minutes.

"For the last six months, Nexicon's pilot customers used our flagship
GetAmnesty product to accomplish what has never been done before --
monetize on a large scale the losses caused by online piracy. One
important feature of the GetAmnesty program is the distribution of DMCA
notices on a mass scale. When we first tested the GetAmnesty program by
emailing DMCA notices to individuals who had illegally downloaded a
copyrighted movie, we received a settlement payment in 11 minutes. For our
customer who owned the copyright to the movie, this was a watershed event.
It confirmed that converting illegal downloaders of digital media into
consumers -- without costly and time-consuming litigation -- is a
reality."

Note this too:

"....as a result of this feedback, Nexicon has further scaled our
technology platform to meet demands, as evidenced by our technology
platform's new ability to send 95 million infringement notices in a single
day. Congratulations go to our CTO Tommy Stiansen and his team for
continuing to drive innovation in our technology platform and developing a
truly remarkable anti-piracy solution."

95 million, can you imagine ?

As for a little more math, the minimum damages under the law is $750 for
EACH copyrighted recording. If someone downloads an album with 10
recordings, that $7,500 (as in yikes).

==================================================
Business Week Article.

Does She Look Like a Music Pirate?

Inside Tanya Andersen's private war with the recording industry. Hint:
She's winning

by Heather Green

When Tanya Andersen opens the door to her modest apartment in suburban
Portland, Ore., her Maltese-terrier mix, Tazz, runs over and wags his tail
in a friendly hello. The 45-year-old single mother doesn't seem like much
of a fighter. She spends most of her days sitting on an overstuffed sofa
with a heating pad behind her back to ease chronic pain and migraines that
have kept her on disability for nearly five years. Her voice is soft and
halting. Yet this woman is behind a fierce assault on the music industry
and its tactics for combating music piracy on the Internet. "I've just got
to keep doing what I believe is right," she says, with Tazz curled up next
to her on the couch. "And that's fighting and letting people know what's
happening."

After being sued by the music industry for stealing songs and winning the
case's dismissal, Andersen is now taking the record industry to court. Her
case is aimed at exposing investigative practices that are controversial
and may be illegal, according to the lawsuit. One company hired by the
record industry, she claims, snoops through people's computers, uncovering
private files and photos, even though it has no legal right to do so. A
different industry-backed company uses tactics similar to those of debt
collectors, pressuring people to pay thousands of dollars in settlements
even before any wrongdoing is proven. In Andersen's case, the industry's
Settlement Support Center said that unless she paid $4,000 to $5,000
immediately, it would "ruin her financially," the suit alleges.

Andersen is going after the recording industry under conspiracy laws. She
argues the Recording Industry Association of America, the industry's trade
group, and its affiliates worked together on a broad campaign to
intimidate people into making financial payoffs. The defendants "secretly
met and conspired" to develop a "litigation enterprise" with the ultimate
goal of preserving the major record companies' control over the music
business. Andersen is requesting class action status for her case, seeking
at least $5 million in compensation for the class.

The RIAA says Andersen's allegations are categorically false. It says it
isn't violating any laws. In fact, the courts have sided with the industry
a number of times when it has faced claims similar to Andersen's. The RIAA
emphasizes that it doesn't want to sue music listeners. But aggressive
steps are necessary, it says, to stop rampant piracy that it figures costs
the U.S. record industry at least $3.7 billion annually in sales. "The
magnitude of this [theft] is incalculable," says Richard L. Gabriel, lead
national counsel for the RIAA and a partner at the Denver law firm Holme,
Roberts, & Owen. "We don't have an illusion that we can shut it down
completely, but we do think that the suits will help get the marketplace
to a fair place, where the illegal doesn't control the legal."

While the recording industry has gone after thousands of people, Andersen
is unusual. Of the 40,000 people the RIAA says it has targeted for legal
action, at most 100 have decided to defend themselves in court, says Fred
von Lohmann, a lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil
liberties group. Few want to pay the legal costs of fighting the music
industry, so most settle cases quickly, even if they believe they're
innocent. Of the people who defend themselves, only a handful have taken
the next step of suing the record industry for their lawyers' fees, and
only a couple have won reimbursement. Andersen, one of the few winners on
all counts, is the first to file a broad lawsuit that has put the RIAA on
the defensive.

JURY AVOIDANCE?

Lawyers around the country who defend people accused of music piracy often
share information, and the evidence Andersen uncovers could have a broad
impact on the legal sparring. Already, the Oregon Attorney General cited
the arguments in Andersen's case when he asked a court to quash a request
by the music industry for the names of 17 students at the University of
Oregon who allegedly shared music online. "The RIAA is fighting very hard
to make sure that [Andersen's case] never reaches a jury," says Heidi Li
Feldman, a professor at Georgetown University's law school. "The minute
this reaches a jury, they will have to think about settling." Gabriel says
the RIAA will pursue the case as vigorously as necessary.

The woman at the center of the dispute grew up in Woodburn, Ore., outside
Portland. Her father died of leukemia when she was six, leaving her mother
to raise Tanya and her younger sister, Tye. Her mother, Sonja Patzer,
worked double shifts as a clerk at the local grocery store, giving up time
with the girls for the money to support them. Tanya started working in a
nursing home cafeteria when she was 16 and moved away two years later to
go to community college in nearby Salem. "The girls were raised that you
need to take care of yourself in life," says Patzer, now 66.

When the RIAA first set its sights on her three years ago, Andersen was
looking after her eight-year-old daughter by herself in the wake of a
divorce. It was December, 2004, and she pulled an envelope out of her
mailbox. Ripping it open, she found a letter from Verizon Communications
(VZ), her Internet service provider, saying it was releasing information
about her. With it was a copy of a page from a subpoena. Andersen had
earned a two-year legal secretary degree while in community college, but
she had no idea what the documents meant. "I thought to myself: "I haven't
done anything wrong,'" she says.

A second, more ominous letter arrived in early February, 2005. The
document, from a law firm in Los Angeles, said she was being sued by
several record companies for copyright infringement because she had shared
their music with others over the Net. "The evidence necessary for the
record companies to prevail in this action has already been secured," the
letter states. It informed her that the minimum damages for each
copyrighted song shared was $750 and encouraged her to contact the
Settlement Support Center to discuss a financial settlement. If she didn't
resolve the issue, she would be sued.

For the first time, Andersen was scared. She tried to e-mail a contact
listed in the letter and called the law firm. A few days later her phone
rang. "Ms. Andersen, I am calling to discuss settlement," she recalls the
person on the other end of the line saying. "Settlement of what?" she
responded. The man explained he was calling from the Settlement Support
Center as a representative of the RIAA. He had information that she had
been caught sharing songs online. To avoid a lawsuit, she would have to
pay $4,000 or $5,000, he said. "You're going to have to pay us, or this
won't go away," she says he told her.

THE SECRET SHARER

Andersen didn't know it at the time, but she was part of a new RIAA piracy
crackdown. The music industry had spent years shutting down startups that
make technology for sharing music over the Internet, such as Napster
(NAPS). But for every tech company shuttered, two more seemed to pop up.
In the fall of 2003, in a public effort to take on piracy, the RIAA
started suing individuals it suspected were giving away copyrighted music.
"Nobody likes playing the heavy and having to resort to litigation," said
RIAA President Cary Sherman at the time. "But when your product is being
regularly stolen, there comes a time when you have to take appropriate
action. We simply cannot allow online piracy to continue destroying the
livelihoods of artists, musicians, songwriters, retailers, and everyone in
the music industry."

The Settlement Support Center was a less public part of the initiative.
Its name may suggest a neutral organization set up to resolve disputes
with evenhanded objectivity. In fact, it was financed by the record
industry and operated like a cross between a call center and a debt
collection firm. The SSC has since been dissolved. The RIAA's law firm,
Holme Roberts & Owen, is representing the organization in court.

The SSC made its collections by hiring people such as Mark Eilers, an
ex-police officer. He called Andersen repeatedly in February and March,
she says, reiterating the demand that she pay thousands of dollars. Over
the course of the calls. Eilers told her she had shared 1,288 songs on May
20, 2004, at 4:24 a.m. under the screen name Gotenkito. She maintained
they had the wrong person and offered to let them look at her computer.
She says Eilers told her Verizon had already verified that the illegal
activity had come from her home, specified by what's known as an IP (for
Internet Protocol) address. Andersen asked to speak with the record
industry's lawyers and get a copy of the information they had about her.
Eilers said no to both requests, says Andersen. Eilers, who no longer
works for the industry, says he doesn't recall speaking with Andersen.

During the summer of 2005, after Eilers stopped calling, Andersen assumed
the RIAA had moved on. Then on Aug. 26, while she was having dinner with
her daughter, Kylee, there was a knock on the door. Kylee got up to open
it, and Andersen followed. A woman standing at the door handed Andersen a
piece of paper and said: "There, you have been served," Andersen recalls.
In her hand were papers for a federal lawsuit filed against her. "I sat
down and I read it. I'm like, "What do I do now?' I'm a single mom. I'm
supporting a kid. This is going to destroy my whole life," she says.

Andersen quickly started looking for a lawyer. She searched the Net for a
case like hers, although she wasn't sure how she would be able to pay
someone on her $1,400 monthly disability check. One local Oregon lawyer
suggested she accept a default guilty judgment and then declare
bankruptcy. But Andersen had been through bankruptcy before, after her
pregnancy with Kylee. She wasn't about to do it again.

Finally she called Lory R. Lybeck, a Seattle lawyer who was handling a
similar case. They talked on the phone, then Lybeck sent one of his
lawyers down to meet Andersen. "I said to myself, either she's a good
actor and a good liar, or what they have done to her is really crummy,"
Lybeck says. He took the case on contingency, meaning he gets paid only if
Andersen collects damages from the recording industry.

Lybeck is a compact 52-year-old with a brawler's attitude. He spent the
early part of his legal career at a large litigation firm representing
companies such as Chrysler, and in 1992, he set up his own two-person
shop. Since then, he has gone after major corporations and government
institutions for alleged wrongdoing. "I dislike arrogant bullies," Lybeck
says.

What struck him about the RIAA was its negotiation tactics. The record
labels accused people of downloading songs worth hundreds of thousands of
dollars in damages, but they set the settlement price at a few thousand.
Paying was cheaper than hiring a lawyer. "To me, that says this isn't
about lawsuits, it's about an extortion campaign," says Lybeck. The RIAA's
Gabriel says: "Our goal isn't to bankrupt people; our goal is to send a
message that copyright infringement is wrong and get some compensation for
the infringement."

As Andersen and the attorney prepared their defense in 2006, his
conviction grew. Yes, Andersen had installed on her computer a software
program, KaZaA, for sharing music over the Net­one reason the RIAA
suspected her. But Andersen deleted the program after a few months and
didn't appear ever to have used it. Plus, some of the music Andersen had
supposedly shared online just didn't fit her taste. The songs included rap
tunes with titles like I Stab People and Dope Nose.

NUMEROUS ERRORS

Lybeck also became convinced that there are fundamental flaws in how the
RIAA uses IP addresses to identify suspects. MediaSentry is the
investigative firm the record industry employs to track pirates. When
MediaSentry sees people swapping music on file-sharing services such as
KaZaA, it records their IP addresses and user names. Then it goes to
Verizon Communications or another Internet service provider to find out
who was using that IP address at the time of the piracy.

But errors can arise in a number of ways. One IP address may be assigned
to a device such as a Wi-Fi router that can be used by several people at
the same time to access the Net wirelessly. So if a visitor or a neighbor
decides to steal music over the Wi-Fi network, the homeowner would still
be fingered. In addition, some people have IP addresses that change every
time they log onto the Net, so the IP address you use in the morning could
be assigned to your neighbor that afternoon. Verizon and other Web service
providers try to track who has which IP address at what time, but their
records can be faulty.

More troublesome, sophisticated computer users can "spoof" IP addresses,
or use one assigned to somebody else. They use a simple piece of software
to forge the IP address on packets of information sent from their
computer, much like someone who puts an address on the back of an envelope
that isn't theirs. The people most likely to spoof are the very tech-savvy
youngsters also mostly likely to be stealing music. Even if the RIAA had
an IP address it believed belonged to Andersen, Lybeck thought, that
wasn't necessarily the case.

In September, 2006, the RIAA asked Andersen a curious question: Did she
know anyone named Chad? She didn't. But Lybeck tracked him down. Chad was
Chad Alstad, a carpet layer who lived in Everett, Wash. He had a MySpace
(NWS) page on which he wrote about downloading content from the Net. And
his user name? Gotenkito, the same name Eilers had said was used in the
alleged piracy. Lybeck was amazed: Alstad seemed a much more likely
suspect than Andersen.

Over the next few months, Lybeck and the record industry tussled over
Andersen's computer. The court ordered Andersen to hand over the computer,
and the RIAA took it to an expert so it could be searched for signs of
music piracy. But then the industry's lawyers refused to release the
expert's report. Ultimately, Donald C. Ashmanskas, the U.S. District Court
judge overseeing the case in Portland, ordered the RIAA to turn over the
information, which it did in January, 2007. The result? No evidence of
piracy.

Lybeck was convinced his defense was airtight. On May 14, he asked the
Portland court for summary judgment. Ashmanskas gave the RIAA until June 1
to provide more evidence linking Andersen to the alleged infringement. In
the week leading up to the deadline, the RIAA told Andersen it would drop
its case if she agreed not to pursue counterclaims. She refused. Finally
on the deadline, industry lawyers dropped the case without conditions and
agreed not to sue Andersen again.

Lybeck still hadn't made a dime for his efforts. He asked Ashmanskas to
make the RIAA pay his legal fees. In September, 2007, the judge agreed. In
his ruling, Ashmanskas wrote that he was awarding the fees in part to
deter prosecution tactics such as the RIAA's. After two years, "no one
even remotely connected to the defendant has been alleged to be the actual
infringer," he wrote. He was also shocked that the RIAA never interviewed
Alstad until well after it had filed suit against Andersen, and then took
Alstad at his word that he hadn't stolen music. "Inexplicably, [the RIAA's
lawyers] credit his denials and discredit [Andersen's]," Ashmanskas wrote.
He ordered the RIAA to pay Lybeck's fees, estimated at $300,000. "That
made me feel that justice was being done," says Andersen.

Gabriel says it's not accurate to say the RIAA dropped its suit for lack
of evidence. He says the user name Gotenkito may have been inspired by
Kylee, since she admitted she liked Dragon Ball Z, a Japanese anime TV
series that has a character with a similar name. He also says Andersen
said in her deposition that she knew or listened to some of the country
and rock artists whose songs were offered for download. "We took the high
road," says Gabriel. "The judge inferred that we dropped the case because
we didn't have enough evidence; we could have pursued the case until the
end of time." Andersen says she and her daughter had nothing to do with
the piracy.

An even bigger battle lies ahead. Andersen and Lybeck filed their own suit
against the RIAA, the SSC, MediaSentry, Warner Music Group, EMI Group,
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, and Universal Music Group last year and
updated it with an amended complaint this month. The record labels
declined to comment for this story, referring questions to the RIAA.

Lybeck figures that with all the potential errors in IP addresses
collected by MediaSentry, the RIAA has gone after thousands of innocent
people. He thinks the addresses could be erroneous as often as 20% of the
time, which would mean 8,000 people wrongly accused. He believes that many
innocent people have been coerced into paying because they can't afford to
fight the RIAA in court. (Although the SSC has stopped operating, an
organization called Settlement Information Line Call Center now plays a
similar role for the music industry.)

"SERIAL BAD FAITH"

MediaSentry declined to comment, deferring to the RIAA. Gabriel says there
have been few instances of mistaken IP addresses. "MediaSentry's
investigation isn't flawed," he says. "The proof is in the pudding. We
have obtained judgments against hundreds and hundreds of people." He
declined to specify the number of settlements.

The RIAA did win a partial victory this week. After a conference call on
Apr. 21 with Lybeck and Gabriel, the court struck Andersen's complaint and
asked Lybeck to refine the claims. As a result, Lybeck plans to drop
charges of fraud and racketeering, which the judge thought would be tough
to prove. "The judge understands what we believe, that there isn't any
merit to these claims," Gabriel.

Still, Andersen's case is very much alive. Lybeck plans to file another
amended complaint by May 1, including the charges of conspiracy,
negligence, and abuse of the legal process. Shortly thereafter, he plans
to start deposing officials from the RIAA and its affiliates in
preparation for a jury trial. "The trick to making this case stick will
depend on to what extent Andersen can show that the RIAA engaged in serial
bad-faith lawsuits," says Richard C. Vasquez, a partner in Seattle at
Morgan Miller Blair who is not involved in the dispute.

From her apartment outside Portland, Andersen remains involved in the
broader case. She collects files on her suit and tracks other disputes
with the RIAA online. One recent winter day, she sipped a Diet Pepsi and
watched Tazz jump from the couch and settle on the floor. "You have to
find some positive in stuff, too," she says. "For whatever reason, I have
been given a unique opportunity to fight this. I feel a responsibility in
a way and want to help others. That pushes me along."

Green is an associate editor for BusinessWeek. With Susann Rutledge

==================================================

2. Nexicon, Sample of Actual Demand Letter from RIAA.

Now this is cool. Or frightening, depending on you perspective.

We found this at the Harverford Academic Computing Center (don't ask)

http://www.haverford.edu/acc/docs/policies/copyright/riaa-2007-02-28/example-riaa-settlement-letter-2007-02-28.html


This is a copy of an RIAA settlement letter dated February 28, 2007. The
identifying information has been removed. Letter provided by
EDUCAUSE/Cornell Institute for Computer Policy and Law.

RIAA Settlement Letter

Holme Roberts & Owen LLP

Attorneys at Law

February 28, 2007

Re Notification of Copyright Infringement Claims

Dear Sir/Madam

We have asked your Internet Service Provider to forward this letter to you
in advance of our filing a lawsuit against you in federal court for
copyright infringement. We represent a number of large record companies,
including EMI Recorded Music, SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, Universal
Music Group and Warner Music Group, as well as all of their subsidiaries
and affiliates ("Record Companies"), in pursuing claims of copyright
infringement against individuals who have illegally uploaded and
downloaded sound recordings on peer-to-peer networks.

We have gathered evidence that you have been infringing copyrights owned
by the Record Companies. We are attaching to this letter a sample of the
sound recordings you were found distributing via the GnutellaUS (LimeWire)
peer-topeer network. In total, you were found distributing 476 audio
files, a substantial number of which are sound recordings controlled by
the Record Companies.

The reason we are sending this letter to you in advance of filing suit is
to give you the opportunity to settle these claims as early as possible.
If you contact us within the next twenty (20) calendar days, we will offer
to settle the claims for a significantly reduced amount compared to what
we will offer to settle them for after we file suit or compared to the
judgment amount a court may enter against you. If you are interested in
resolving this matter now, please contact our Settlement Information Line
at 913-234-8181 or, alternatively, you may settle this matter immediately
online at www.p2plawsuits.com, using the CASE ID# that appears at the top
of this letter.

In deciding whether you wish to settle this matter, here are Some things
you should consider

* The Copyright Act imposes a range of statutory damages for copyright
infringement. The minimum damages under the law is $750 for each
copyrighted recording that has been infringed ("shared"). The maximum
damage award can be substantially more. In addition to damages, you may
also be responsible for paying the legal fees we incur in order to pursue
these claims, and are subject to having an injunction entered against you
prohibiting you from further infringing activity.

* Now that you are aware that a lawsuit may be filed against you, there is
an obligation for you to preserve evidence that relates to the claims
against you. In this case, that means, at a minimum, the entire library of
recordings that you have made available for distribution as well as any
recordings you have downloaded, need to be maintained as evidence.
Further, you should not attempt to delete the peer-to-peer programs from
your system - though you must stop them from operating. For information on
how to do this, you may visit www.musicunited.org.

This is a serious matter and to the extent you have any questions, we
strongly encourage you to contact us to ask those questions. Finally, if
you would like more information regarding music downloading/file sharing
and peer-to-peer networks, please visit www.p2plawsuits.com.

IF WE DO NOT HEAR FROM YOU WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE
OF THIS LETTER, THEN WE WILL FILE SUIT AGAINST YOU IN FEDERAL COURT.

We are not your lawyers, nor are we giving you legal advice. We urge you
to consult with an attorney immediately to advise you on your rights and
responsibilities.

Sincerely,

Donald J. Kelso

EXHIBIT A


CASE ID#
IP Address
P2P Network GnutellaUS (LimeWire)

Copyright Owner
Artis
Recordine
Title
Album Title
SRN

Warner Bros. Records Inc.
Linkin Park
Points Of Authority
Hybrid Theory
288-402

UMG Recordings, Inc.
3 Doors Down
Kryptonite
The Better Life
277-407

SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT
Celine Dion
It's All Coming Back To
Falling Into You
224-159

Arista Records LLC
TLC
Me Now
Creep
CrazySexyCool
198-743

BMG Music
Alabama
There's No Way
40 Hour Week
60-774

BMG Music
Christina Aguilera
Genie in a Bottle
Christina
274-004

Capitol Records, Inc.
Chris LeDoux
Life Is a Highway
Aguilera
One Road Man
260-057

Warner Bros. Records Inc.
Chicago
You're the Inspiration
Chicago 17
54-174

UMG Recordings, Inc.
Nazareth
Hair of the Dog
Hair Of The Dog
N23222

NXCN: This release contains statements that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. These statements appear in a number of places in this release and
include all statements that are not statements of historical fact
regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company, its
directors or its officers with respect to, among other things: (i) the
Company's financing plans; (ii) trends affecting the Company's financial
condition or results of operations; (iii) the Company's growth strategy
and operating strategy; and (iv) the declaration and payment of dividends.
The words "may," "would," "will," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate,"
"believe," "intend," and similar expressions and variations thereof are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned
that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond
the Company's ability to control, and that actual results may differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors. Client we have been retained by the company for
one million pre-split shares and ten thousand dollars.
OTC Bulletin Board have factors which create an
uncertainty about the their ability to continue as a going concern. These
concerns are typically related to financing (or lack of), competitive
environments, lack of operating history and operating at loss levels which
is typical of most start-ups.
These statement can usually be found in their most recent 10Q filings and
typically you don't have to dig to far down past the financial tables. We
like to use http://www.pinksheets.com for quick and easy access to SEC
filings. We think it would be wise for most investors to assume that all
companies listed on the OTC Bulletin Board (and many on NASDAQ) have going
concern issues.
================================================
Disclaimer: Important Distinction #1. First and foremost the Watch List is
just that. A watch list. It is not a buy list. Meaning that there will be
no buys or sales issued by the Internet Stock Review. If this was a buy
list, you can rest assured that we would crank up our Public Relations arm
into high gear, full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes to make everyone
know just how brilliant we were when we issued the list. Interviews on
CNBC, articles in Barron's and accolades in the Wall Street Journal--the
only thing we love more than money is praise and fame--but it just isn't
going to happen. What the Internet Stock Review is...is a "news
aggregation service". With the advent of the Internet, everyone knows what
that term means. What it means to us is the following: We will follow the
progress of as many Internet related publicly traded stocks as humanly
possible (The large, the small and the minuscule) and advise you of when
they have reported news. As a subscriber to the Internet Stock Review,
this means you will be able to broadly follow the entire industry right
from a single e-mail. We will report who released news and point (with
hyper links) to where the news can be found. We try to use Yahoo! Finance
as extensively as possible so we don't send you all over cyberspace. We
love Yahoo, you will too. Any decisions as to buy or sell however, are
strictly up to you. Which leads to important distinction #2. How do we get
paid? The Internet Stock Review is owned by a Public Relations firm
(Institutional Analyst Inc.) that specializes in getting (or creating)
coverage for publicly traded companies. As such, is important to note that
anytime we say anything about a company, it is because the company is a
client of our parent company, or because we would like them to be a client
of our parent company. In a nutshell, you can throw out any thoughts of us
being even a little bit impartial. It just ain't gonna happen. We love
everyone. Final note is we that have over 20,000 subscribers so please
excuse our dust. Institutional Analyst Inc. is an independent research and
investor-relations consulting firm that publishes investment-research
reports such as The Internet Stock Review on independently selected
companies. While it is its intent to identify and research companies that
it believes might prove to be profitable investments, The Internet Stock
Review is not liable for any investment decisions by its readers. Neither
The Internet Stock Review nor any report published by Internet PR Group,
Inc represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed
within the report. It is strongly recommended that any purchase or sale
decisions be discussed with a financial adviser or broker prior to
completing any such purchase or sale decision. The information contained
herein is provided as an information service only and is based upon
sources deemed reliable, but not guaranteed by The Internet Stock Review.
Past performance of previously featured companies does not guarantee the
future success of any currently featured or mentioned company. The
information contained herein is subject to change without notice, and The
Internet Stock Review assumes no responsibility to update the information
in this or any report published. Use of this or any report published by
The Internet Stock Review may be subject to the applicable rules of
certain self-regulatory organizations and the securities mentioned herein,
which are traded Over The Counter, and may not be cleared for sale in
certain states. The Internet Stock Review and/or its employees, officers,
affiliates or members of their families may have long or short positions
in any of the securities discussed in this or other reports published
herein (and/or options or warrants relating thereto) and may purchase and
or sell these securities, options or warrants from time to time in the
open market or otherwise. The Internet Stock Review may derive
compensation through research services and subscriptions and/or
investor-relations consulting from the companies featured or mentioned in
its reports. Write or call The Internet Stock Review for disclosure
details as required by Rule 17b as it relates to individual issues.
Institutional Analyst Inc., In no event shall The
Internet Stock Review report be liable for direct, indirect, incidental or
consequential damages resulting from the use of this information. The
Internet Stock Review shall be indemnified and held harmless from any
actions, claims, proceedings or liabilities with respect to the
information herein. The Internet Stock Review is not a securities
broker-dealer, investment advisor or a securities exchange and is not
registered as such with the Securities and Exchange commission nor any
state securities regulation authority. Readers of this e-mail newsletter
should recognize that the Internet Stock Review is only providing a
delivery service to electronically transmit information to potential
investors. In this respect, the Internet Stock Review is no different than
the provider of any other delivery service such as the United States Post
Office or any other express delivery service. Accordingly, investors
should be aware that the Internet Stock Review has not evaluated nor
investigated any of the companies listed in this e-mail to determine their
merit or the risk of investment in any such company. The Internet does not
endorse any company listed herein and the Internet Stock Review does not
represent that the information contained in any offering documents states
all material facts or does not omit a material fact necessary to make the
statements therein not misleading. [email protected]

[setravis]

sir_joke,  As per your request.
The ticker symbol has been changed to NXCO.PK
I will leave you the chart.

[sir_joke]

moving today. nice white hammer yesterday,,,,

volume at the start of the day and moving up!

Looking strong and supported.

cheers,
SJ

[sir_joke]

another white hammer in the making on large volume...

This one is moving.

cheers,
SJ

disclaimer: currently holding 6.7 million shares.
Holding is the key term here.

[sir_joke]

building towards explosion...

two white hammers after black week.... check out the chart:


it's going ot be a profitable week!

cheers,
SJ

[sir_joke]

awesome chart, all buying at the ask. No trading at the bid and very few sellers of substance.
now is the time to get in for the ride.

Trade to make cash, invest to make a fortune:

cheers,
Sj

[sir_joke]

bouncing around on low volume... currently on an upward trend.

Bottom has held and reversal in the works. See previous chart.....

cheers,
SJ