3StocksOnFire — US Stock Trading Community · 451+ trades · 257% returns · 15,000 members · Main Site · Trader's Guide · Articles · Video Analyses
3 Stocks On Fire
3StocksOnFire Community Forum
Home Message Boards Trader's Guide Articles Video Analysis About Us Search Register

News:

Welcome to 3StocksOnFire! US stock trading community (2005-2010) with 451+ documented trades and 15,000+ members. View Portfolios | Stock Articles | Quotes

Main Menu

EGO

Started by cmshop, August 09, 2005, 03:35:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

cmshop

Look like it is right at the support level with a flag, and is on a uptrend, short-term at least get up to $3.0 level. Major resistence may be at $3.4.


cmshop

Here is chart.

nikao

nice pick.. but I see the following:

a break out of a symmetrical triangle confirmed by volume, it's currently testing the former resistance of the triangle. If it will hold it would be a valid break out with a lot of potential.



cmshop

Strong support at $2.70 and closed at 2.75 with 2x volume.

nikao

looks like today will be important..

to bad I can't trade this stock with my broker in the Netherlands ;)


Melf Elf

Quote from: cmshop on August 09, 2005, 05:04:24 PM
Strong support at $2.70 and closed at 2.75 with 2x volume.

Interesting pick and good analysis.  Applause.

Yesterday's Doji Star hammer (needs upside confirmation) looks to be a re-validation of the up trendline that you mentioned in your first post.  That trendline got violated on an intraday basis on August 1, but it held at the close.  Yesterday's low was about dead on it (maybe a penny off), re-validating it as support.   

EGO could have some nice upside if it can take out 3.12 on good volume.

cmshop

Up 4% holding above 2.80 now.

cmshop


Melf Elf

Quote from: cmshop on August 11, 2005, 09:39:43 AM
It is above 3.00 now.

Yeah, it's up nicely today. Good call.  Applause. 

It hit 3.11.  I'd like to see it take out 3.12, the August 3 high and the pattern breakout, on volume.

cmshop

Look like it is a winning trade. It closed at 3.17 today. May move higher. But I don't know if it retrace a little before it goes higher. In several days, it gets about 16% gain. ANX is kind of like EGO several days ago when I posted, doesn't it?

Terliso

Profile:

Eldorado Gold Corporation based in Vancouver Canada is an international gold producing company active in development and exploration. The Company's shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol ELD and on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol EGO. ELD is on the S&P/TSX Gold Index and EGO was added to the AMEX Gold BUGS Index - HUI on June 21, 2004. The Company has superior gold assets in Brazil and Turkey; two countries that we believe have substantial geological potential. Production in 2003 from our 100% owned São Bento Mine in Brazil was 95,049 ounces of gold at a cash cost of US$234/oz. Forecasted production for 2004 is 85,000 ounces of gold at a cash cost of US$270/oz. São Bento has produced more than 1.5 million ounces of gold since 1987. At Sâo Bento 2003 proven and probable reserves are 506,190 ounces; measured and indicated resources are 616,714 ounces.



A rectangle is a chart pattern that contains price movements between two parallel lines. they usually horizontal but can sometimes slant up or down. You need at least four points to draw a rectangle: the upper line connects two rally tops, and the lower line connects two bottoms. these lines should be drawn through the edges of congestion areas rather than across the extreme highs and lows.

As you can see from the chart below, Bulls obviously won the battle within the rectangle & backed by high volume recently... i believe EGO will make new highs in the coming days & weeks ;)

Terliso

EGO...rising!! hits new high... i'll keep holding my EGO  :D ;D

Terliso

UPDATED CHART:

Terliso

GOLD stocks are rocketing ...gold index hovering @ $515

Terliso

#14
Four Gold Stocks to Avoid
Wednesday November 23, 6:00 am ET
By Parvathy Krishnan, CFA


Gold prices have been skyrocketing recently, continuing the secular bull market in gold that started in 2001. After starting the year at $420 per ounce, gold prices have rallied to within shouting distance of $500 per ounce, levels not seen since the late 1980s. Not surprisingly, gold bugs feel vindicated, and the metal and its producers have been getting a lot of attention from the financial press and potential investors.
ADVERTISEMENT


So, is this a time to invest in gold, gold stocks, gold mutual funds, or gold exchange-traded funds? My colleague Michele Gambera has some interesting thoughts on this subject. As value-oriented investors, we at Morningstar believe in buying assets at a discount to their intrinsic value and waiting patiently for prices to recover. The metal has been justifiably touted, though, as an inflation hedge and portfolio diversifier. However, gold stocks, while highly correlated with gold, carry additional baggage that may offset some of their diversification and inflation-hedge benefits. As I've written before, gold miners are plagued with rising costs, lack of control over the price of their product, and few product differentiation opportunities. It follows that most gold producers have no competitive advantage, or economic moat, and their returns on invested capital trail their cost of capital.

Historically high prices, no moat, poor returns on invested capital--these are all reasons we find the sector in general quite unattractive at this time. It is not surprising that most gold stocks today get our 1-star rating.

Having said that, there are a few gold producers of whom we are particularly wary because they expose the investor to additional risks for one of several reasons. First, these stocks tend to have higher-than-average operational risk. This is a characteristic of small, undiversified producers whose output relies on a small group of mines or even a single mine. Because this is the case, a small operational glitch could severely affect overall production and revenue. Second, extraction costs at these companies tend to be above average. High costs are very undesirable in a price-taker's market like gold because it means producers will be among the first to incur losses if commodity prices take a dive. Indeed, even with the price of gold at the current high levels, three of these four companies we have singled out below have posted losses so far this year. Finally, our less desirable companies tend to have operations in politically unstable countries, adding geopolitical risk.

Cambior (AMEX:CBJ - News)
Three of Cambior's four mines (one in Guyana and two in Canada) are high-cost operations. Costs at the fourth mine--Rosebel in Suriname--are not substantially below average. The company's extraction costs in 2004 were $257 an ounce, compared with the industry average of about $250. Cambior is also subject to a high level of operational risk due to its small number of mines. For example, milling operations have been suspended at Rosebel this week due to a leakage. Because Rosebel produces about half of the company's gold, a stoppage here, even if temporary, will have a big adverse impact on overall production and revenue. Finally, Cambior's debt--at 12% of total capital--is relatively high for a gold producer. Paying down debt during flush times, like now, is considered a best practice in the mining industry. However, Cambior has been only marginally profitable so far in 2005, and the company has not brought down its debt level during the year. When gold prices fall and profits turn to losses, servicing this debt might become a burden the firm cannot bear, given its high operation costs.

Bema Gold (AMEX:BGO - News)
Bema operates two mines--one in Russia and one in South Africa. While the economics of the Russian mine are respectable with slightly below-average cash costs, the South African operation has been a drag on profits and cash flow since Bema started mining there in 2003. However, instead of improving profitability at its existing operations, the company is intent on raising production from about 290,000 ounces projected for 2005 to 1 million ounces. Given the lack of cash flow from operations, Bema has been forced to raise additional equity and debt capital to fund its exploration and expansion projects. As a result, Bema has one of the weakest balance sheets in the gold mining industry. Negative free cash flow, a weak balance sheet, and uncertain prospects make an investment in Bema little more than a speculative bet on the company's future, in our opinion.

Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL - News)
Given all the risks at Hecla--a relatively small production base in unattractive countries, future production not growing as much as expected, commodity prices not cooperating, as well as more financing and environmental charges--an investment in these shares remains highly speculative.

DRDGold (NasdaqSC:DROOY - News)
Mining gold in South Africa is a high-cost business that started more than a century ago. As more gold is mined, mines get deeper and costs generally rise. In addition, older technology and strong labor unions in South Africa also contribute significantly to the high costs prevalent in that country. Even by South African standards, DRDGold is saddled with relatively high cost and older mines. While recent efforts at operational improvements mean that DRDGold is less of a "cigar-butt investment" than before, we do not think the company is out of the woods. Even with all the improvements, we still expect the company's cash costs to be more than $300 per ounce, compared with the industry average of around $250 per ounce. For DRDGold to consistently turn a profit, gold must trade at prices comfortably above the firm's operating costs and relevant currency-exchange rates must cooperate. As a commodity producer, DRDGold has little influence over either of these factors because it is a price-taker in both the gold and the foreign-exchange markets.

Should gold prices fall precipitously in the next year or two, something that is not inconceivable, these companies will be among the first to suffer.